Cartesian rethinking - a circle unwound
Lately I read a book called 'Maya', by Jostein Gaarder. He's a Norwegian author, and I've read two of his other books called 'Sophie's World' and 'The Solitaire Mystery' respectively. He usually puts in pieces of philosophy in his stories, and it makes for quite good reading. With this book he appears to hold a very firm 'evolutionary' and atheistic standpoint (or at least the characters do), but that's not quite what I want to observe today. No, I want to do a little bit of my own philosophy, which has probably been done before, but if it has, I'm not aware of it. So, we've heard on inumerable occasions Descartes' legendary premise Cogito Ergo Sum , 'I think therefore I am'. Now many people criticise this as flawed logic, that even if one is, it doesnt necessarily depend on them thinking , or some other convuluted twisting of thoughts and the merry-go-round usage of reasonable logic. Today I was thinking on the issue...